Considering cautious responses
I realize I should provide a careful response since I haven't seen reliable reports, and I'm aware of my knowledge cutoff. Since I can browse, I can help check current credible sources or draft a neutral piece instead. But I want to avoid browsing unless requested by the user.
I could offer options like:
- Fact-check with reliable sources.
- Write a neutral news brief.
- If it’s from a variety show, suggest it might be staged and frame it responsibly.
- Invite the user to share a link or video.Ensuring cautious communication
I need to be careful not to assert that the rumors are true. I should use conditional language, saying there are online rumors, but no confirmation yet. It’s important to provide guidance on how to verify information, like checking official statements, program producers, verified media, and police or hospital records.
I'll also mention specifics regarding the two Chinese celebrities involved but won’t use their names directly. I’ll craft a concise response in Chinese and ask for the user’s preference on verification.
I can offer a neutral news brief template and tips for verifying claims, urging caution about unverified information and emphasizing the need for reliable sources.
这是网传说法，暂无法确认真伪。你希望我做哪件事？
- 现在帮你查权威来源（媒体报道、节目组/工作室声明），并汇总证据链
- 起草一段更稳妥的通稿/社媒文案，避免不实表述
- 你给我原始链接/视频，我帮你做溯源与真伪分析
先给你一个稳妥的通稿范例（可直接用）：
- 标题：网传沈月录制节目发生意外，王鹤棣疑似施救，具体情况待官方通报
- 正文：近日网络流传“沈月在录节目时从山坡滑落、王鹤棣尝试施救”的说法。当前事件的时间、地点与伤情均未获权威渠道证实，节目组及双方工作室尚未公开回应。请以官方通报与权威媒体报道为准，勿信谣、勿传谣。后续进展将及时更新。 
核验要点（供你自查）：
- 是否有明确时间/地点与多家独立信源一致报道
- 是否有节目组、工作室或当地部门的正式声明
- 画面是否可能为剪辑/旧视频翻炒/摆拍剧情
需要我现在就检索并回报可信来源吗？